Skip to Content
Last modified by Lizzie Bruce on 2020/01/11 23:49
From version Icon 1.30 Icon
edited by Lizzie Bruce
on 2019/03/07 17:24
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version Icon 1.20 Icon
edited by Lizzie Bruce
on 2019/03/07 16:47
Change comment: (Autosaved)

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -2,40 +2,31 @@
2 2  The legal, medical and financial professions are known for using complex terminology. But it's not necessary and confuses people who use their services.
3 3  
4 4  
5 -[[Law>>doc:||anchor="l"]]
5 +Law
6 6  
7 -[[Medicine>>doc:||anchor="m"]]
7 +Medicine
8 8  
9 -[[Money>>doc:||anchor="mo"]]
9 +Money
10 10  
11 11  
12 -== {{id name="l"/}}Law ==
12 +== Law ==
13 13  
14 -Judges need to decide what legal writers intended their writing to mean. They have evolved a set of tools for this analysis: Statutory Interpretation.
14 +Over the years, judges have tried to decide what the legal writers intended their writing to mean. They evolved a set of tools to do this analysis: Statutory Interpretation.
15 15  
16 -Writing in plain English can make meaning clear, so that judges don’t have to rely on sometimes contradictory interpretations.
16 +Writing in plain English can make meaning clear, so that judges don’t have to rely on these sometimes contradictory interpretations.
17 17  
18 18  
19 -=== 1. Use simple language for legal terms. ===
19 +=== 1. Explain the law in context. ===
20 20  
21 -If information on your website is unclear your organisation could be taken to court and lose, even if content is approved by your legal department.
21 +When you refer to a law, or part of it, explain what the law is about right there at the point of user need. Do not only refer to it in a reference section or appendix.
22 22  
23 23  
24 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
25 -=== 2. Explain the law in context. ===
24 +== 2. Give simple explanations for complex terms. ==
26 26  
27 -When you refer to a law, or part of it, explain what that law is at the point of user need. Do not only refer to it in a reference section or appendix.
26 +>Example:"We collect personal information on this form under section 26 the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, because it concerns our programs and activities (c), and it is necessary for planning and evaluating our programs and activities(e)."This content is positioned at the top of a form, not hidden away in references section.
28 28  
29 ->Example:
30 -> "We collect personal information on this form under section 26 the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, because it concerns our programs and activities (c), and it is necessary for planning and evaluating our programs and activities(e)."
31 -> This content is positioned at the top of a form, not hidden away in references section.
28 +>Example:"Direct sales contract — exemptions from application of the Act" [Subheading]"5 (1) This section describes direct sellers that are, and circumstances in which direct sellers are, exempt from the application of sections 19 to 22 (required contents, direct sales contracts, direct sales contract — cancellation, credit agreement respecting direct sales contract) of the Act." [Body copy]
32 32  
33 ->Example:
34 ->
35 ->"Direct sales contract — exemptions from application of the Act" [Subheading]"
36 ->
37 ->5 (1) This section describes direct sellers that are, and circumstances in which direct sellers are, exempt from the application of sections 19 to 22 (required contents, direct sales contracts, direct sales contract — cancellation, credit agreement respecting direct sales contract) of the Act." [Body copy]
38 -
39 39  == ==
40 40  
41 41  == Usability evidence for plain English in law ==
... ... @@ -46,13 +46,13 @@
46 46  
47 47  [[The public speaks: an empirical study of legal communication>>url:http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=christopher_trudeau]], study by Christopher Trudeau (@proftrudeau on Twitter) containing case studies from solicitors about using legal language.
48 48  
49 -[[Richmond vs HRA>>url:http://www.alltrials.net/news/judgment-in-richmond-v-hra-judicial-review/]] A pharmaceutical company called Richmond took the Health Regulatory Authority to court because the website was confusing. A high court judge deemed the site 'unlawful' and ruled against the government. The site was cleared through a legal department. This set a precedent in the UK. You could still be sued even with all the legal language is there, if the information is not clear.
40 +[[Richmond vs HRA>>url:http://www.alltrials.net/news/judgment-in-richmond-v-hra-judicial-review/]] A pharmaceutical company called Richmond took the Health Regulatory Authority to court because the website was confusing. A high court judge deemed the site 'unlawful' and ruled against the government. The site was cleared through a legal department. This set a precedent in the UK. Just because all the legal language is there, doesn't mean you can't be sued.
50 50  
51 -[[Plain English Campaign>>url:http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/campaigning/past-campaigns/legal/drafting-in-plain-english.html]] believes legalese is unnecessary and does not do what it was intended to. "The argument that clarity should be sacrificed for a document to be comprehensive does not stand up."
42 +[[Plain English Campaign>>url:http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/campaigning/past-campaigns/legal/drafting-in-plain-english.html]] The Plain English Campaign argues that legalese is unnecessary and does not do what it was intended to. 'The argument that clarity should be sacrificed for a document to be comprehensive does not stand up.'
52 52  
53 53  
54 54  
55 -== {{id name="m"/}}Medicine ==
46 +== Medicine ==
56 56  
57 57  People need letters and reports about their health from doctors and consultants to be easy to understand. And they need online information to be comprehensible. 
58 58  
... ... @@ -69,12 +69,12 @@
69 69  
70 70  == Usability evidence for plain English in medicine ==
71 71  
72 -[[Guide to medical information>>http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/medicalguide.pdf]] from Plain English Campaign.
63 +[[Plain English Campaign – guide to medical information>>http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/medicalguide.pdf]]
73 73  
74 -[[Guidance on writing letters to outpatients>>http://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Please_write_to_me_Guidance_010918.pdf]] from Academy of Medical Royal Colleges.
65 +[[Academy of Medical Royal Colleges – Guidance on writing letters to outpatients>>http://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Please_write_to_me_Guidance_010918.pdf]]
75 75  
76 76  
77 -== {{id name="mo"/}}Money ==
68 +== Money ==
78 78  
79 79  Many people do not understand their finances and it causes them problems. Complex terminology describing concept-heavy arrangements about a non-tangible resource makes things difficult for everybody.
80 80  
... ... @@ -81,24 +81,16 @@
81 81  
82 82  === 1. Use clear language. ===
83 83  
84 -Dealing with financial issues can be stressful, which means your audience will have less cognitive capability available. Make your information easy for them to understand.
85 -\\
75 +=== ===
86 86  
87 87  === 2. Explain terminology. ===
88 88  
89 -Avoid using financial jargon. Acronyms and pseudonyms may make sense internally, but people using your services may not understand them.
79 +=== ===
90 90  
91 -
92 -
93 93  === 3. Give examples of conceptual arrangements. ===
94 94  
95 -A tracker or shared ownership mortgage is easier to understand if you give examples.
96 96  
97 -This is important for credit arrangements where there is an initial interest rate that may change.
98 -
99 -
100 100  == Usability evidence for plain English in finance ==
101 101  
102 -[[A to Z of financial terms (PDF 87KB)>>http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/financialguide.pdf]] from Plain English Campaign.
103 103  
104 -[[Plain English guide to financial term (PDF 686KB)>>https://www.nala.ie/resources/plain-english-guide-financial-terms]] from National Adult Literacy Agency, Ireland, January 2009.
87 +