Skip to Content
Last modified by Lizzie Bruce on 2020/01/11 23:49
From version Icon 2.1 Icon
edited by Lizzie Bruce
on 2019/04/24 11:03
Change comment: Adding evidence from AM
To version Icon 2.2 Icon
edited by Lizzie Bruce
on 2019/04/24 13:55
Change comment: Added LSE blog link

Summary

Details

Icon Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
89 89  
90 90  === {{id name="#m2"/}} 4. Explain medical terms. ===
91 91  
92 -Medical terms are unlikely to be understood by your readers. It similar to assuming they would know a word in a foreign language. Follow the word or phrase with a plain English explanation.
92 +Medical terms are unlikely to be understood by your readers. It's similar to assuming they would know a word in a foreign language. Follow the word or phrase with a plain English explanation.
93 93  
94 94  
95 95  === {{id name="#mo1"/}}5. Use clear language for financial information. ===
... ... @@ -125,8 +125,10 @@
125 125  
126 126  [[Plain language: the underlying research>>url:https://www.victorialawfoundation.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/Schriver_Karen%20Clarity2012.pdf]], Karen Schriver slide presentation, pages 29 to 35.
127 127  
128 -[[The public speaks: an empirical study of legal communication>>url:http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=christopher_trudeau]], study by Christopher Trudeau (@proftrudeau on Twitter) containing case studies from solicitors about using legal language.
128 +[['The public speaks: an empirical study of legal communication'>>https://works.bepress.com/christopher_trudeau/4/]], Christopher Trudeau, study includes solicitor case studies, 2017
129 129  
130 +[['Parliamentary language and immigration'>>http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/parliamentary-language-and-immigration/]], London School of Economics blog post
131 +
130 130  [[Richmond vs HRA>>url:http://www.alltrials.net/news/judgment-in-richmond-v-hra-judicial-review/]] A pharmaceutical company called Richmond took the Health Regulatory Authority to court because the website was confusing. A high court judge deemed the site 'unlawful' and ruled against the government. The site was cleared through a legal department. This set a precedent in the UK. You could still be sued even with all the legal language is there, if the information is not clear.
131 131  
132 132  [[Plain English Campaign>>url:http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/campaigning/past-campaigns/legal/drafting-in-plain-english.html]] believes legalese is unnecessary and does not do what it was intended to. "The argument that clarity should be sacrificed for a document to be comprehensive does not stand up."
... ... @@ -141,9 +141,11 @@
141 141  
142 142  [[NHS content style guide beta>>https://beta.nhs.uk/service-manual/content/how-we-write]], January 2019
143 143  
144 -[[A to Z of financial terms (PDF 87KB)>>http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/financialguide.pdf]] from Plain English Campaign.[[Plain English guide to financial term (PDF 686KB)>>https://www.nala.ie/resources/plain-english-guide-financial-terms]] from National Adult Literacy Agency, Ireland, January 2009.
146 +[[A to Z of financial terms (PDF 87KB)>>http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/financialguide.pdf]] from Plain English Campaign.
145 145  
148 +[[Plain English guide to financial term (PDF 686KB)>>https://www.nala.ie/resources/plain-english-guide-financial-terms]] from National Adult Literacy Agency, Ireland, January 2009.
146 146  
150 +
147 147  (% class="box" %)
148 148  (((
149 149  See also: