Changes for page Legal, medical and financial terms
Last modified by Lizzie Bruce on 2020/01/11 23:49
From version 4.1
edited by Lizzie Bruce
on 2019/06/10 13:23
on 2019/06/10 13:23
Change comment:
added matthew williams ebook on legislative lang and politics free preview
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -L egal, medicalandfinancial terms1 +Law, medicine and money - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,170 +18,104 @@ 1 -(% class="box" %) 2 -((( 3 -{{id name="#UM"/}}Following this helps: 4 - 5 - 6 -* **people in a hurry** – simply written content is quicker to scan 7 -* **people who are stressed** – if you're anxious it's difficult to understand complex text 8 -* **people who are multi-tasking** – when distracted complex text is harder to comprehend 9 -* **people with low literacy** – will not know meanings of complex vocabulary and terms 10 -* **cognitive impairments** – words that are easy to understand involve less cognitive load 11 -* **visual impairments** – short, simple sentences convey meaning in a smaller visual field 12 -* **motor impairments** – it takes less physical effort to navigate shorter content 13 -))) 14 - 15 - 16 -== Guidance == 17 - 18 18 (% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 19 -The legal, financial and medical professions are known for complex terminology. This is not necessary and confuses people. 20 - 2 +The legal, medical and financial professions are known for using complex terminology. But it's not necessary and confuses people who use their services. 21 21 22 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 23 -**Health:** People need to understand doctors' letters and consultant reports easily. They need to be able to comprehend online information about health. 24 24 25 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 26 -**Finances: **Many people do not understand financial terms. This causes problems. Complex terminology describing conceptual arrangements is not helpful. 5 +[[Law>>doc:||anchor="l"]] 27 27 28 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 29 -**Law: **Judges created a set of tools to decide what legal writers intended: Statutory Interpretation. But analyses can contradict each other. Plain English makes meaning clearer from the start. 7 +[[Medicine>>doc:||anchor="m"]] 30 30 9 +[[Money>>doc:||anchor="mo"]] 31 31 32 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="H1.Usesimplelanguageforlegalterms." %) 33 -[[1. Use simple language for legal terms.>>doc:||anchor="#l1"]] 34 34 35 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="H2.Explainthelawincontext." %) 36 -[[2. Explain the law in context.>>doc:||anchor="#l2"]] 12 +== {{id name="l"/}}Law == 37 37 38 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="H1.Writeclearly." %) 39 -[[3. Write medical information clearly.>>doc:||anchor="#m1"]] 14 +Judges need to decide what legal writers intended their writing to mean. They have evolved a set of tools for this analysis: Statutory Interpretation. 40 40 41 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="H2.Explainmedicalterms." %) 42 -[[4. Explain medical terms.>>doc:||anchor="#m2"]] 16 +Writing in plain English can make meaning clear, so that judges don’t have to rely on sometimes contradictory interpretations. 43 43 44 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="H1.Useclearlanguage." %) 45 -[[5. Use clear language for financial information.>>doc:||anchor="#mo1"]] 46 46 47 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="H2.Explainterminology." %) 48 -[[6. Explain financial terminology.>>doc:||anchor="#mo2"]] 19 +=== 1. Use simple language for legal terms. === 49 49 50 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="H3.Giveexamplesofconceptualarrangements." %) 51 -[[7. Give examples of conceptual financial arrangements.>>doc:||anchor="#mo3"]] 52 - 53 -[[Usability evidence>>doc:||anchor="#UEL"]] 54 - 55 - 56 ----- 57 - 58 -=== {{id name="#l1"/}}1. Use simple language for legal terms. === 59 - 60 60 If information on your website is unclear your organisation could be taken to court and lose, even if content is approved by your legal department. 61 61 62 62 63 -=== {{id name="#l2"/}}2. Explain the law in context. === 24 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 25 +=== 2. Explain the law in context. === 64 64 65 65 When you refer to a law, or part of it, explain what that law is at the point of user need. Do not only refer to it in a reference section or appendix. 66 66 29 +>Example: 30 +> "We collect personal information on this form under section 26 the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, because it concerns our programs and activities (c), and it is necessary for planning and evaluating our programs and activities(e)." 31 +> This content is positioned at the top of a form, not hidden away in references section. 67 67 68 -Example: 69 -\\(% class="mark" %)Positioned at the top of a form, not hidden away in references section: 33 +>Example: 34 +> 35 +>"Direct sales contract — exemptions from application of the Act" [Subheading]" 36 +> 37 +>5 (1) This section describes direct sellers that are, and circumstances in which direct sellers are, exempt from the application of sections 19 to 22 (required contents, direct sales contracts, direct sales contract — cancellation, credit agreement respecting direct sales contract) of the Act." [Body copy] 70 70 71 -((( 72 -"We collect personal information on this form under section 26 the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, because it concerns our programs and activities (c), and it is necessary for planning and evaluating our programs and activities(e)." 73 -))) 39 +== == 74 74 41 +== Usability evidence for plain English in law == 75 75 76 -Example: 77 -\\[Subheading] 78 -(% class="mark" %)"**Direct sales contract — exemptions from application of the Act**(%%) 79 - 43 +[['Joseph Kimble—No, the law does not (normally) require legalese'>>url:http://www.ivacheung.com/2015/07/joseph-kimble-no-the-law-does-not-normally-require-legalese-editing-goes-global-2015/]] Editing Goes Global, 2015. Professor Joseph Kimble discusses the "psuedo-precision of legalese". 80 80 81 -[Body copy] 82 -(% class="mark" %)5 (1) This section describes direct sellers that are, and circumstances in which direct sellers are, exempt from the application of sections 19 to 22 (required contents, direct sales contracts, direct sales contract — cancellation, credit agreement respecting direct sales contract) of the Act." 45 +[[Plain language: the underlying research>>url:https://www.victorialawfoundation.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/Schriver_Karen%20Clarity2012.pdf]], Karen Schriver slide presentation, pages 29 to 35. 83 83 47 +[[The public speaks: an empirical study of legal communication>>url:http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=christopher_trudeau]], study by Christopher Trudeau (@proftrudeau on Twitter) containing case studies from solicitors about using legal language. 84 84 85 - === {{idname="#m1"/}}3.Write medical information clearly.===49 +[[Richmond vs HRA>>url:http://www.alltrials.net/news/judgment-in-richmond-v-hra-judicial-review/]] A pharmaceutical company called Richmond took the Health Regulatory Authority to court because the website was confusing. A high court judge deemed the site 'unlawful' and ruled against the government. The site was cleared through a legal department. This set a precedent in the UK. You could still be sued even with all the legal language is there, if the information is not clear. 86 86 87 - Usersftheinformationmighthockoranxious,which reducescognition.51 +[[Plain English Campaign>>url:http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/campaigning/past-campaigns/legal/drafting-in-plain-english.html]] believes legalese is unnecessary and does not do what it was intended to. "The argument that clarity should be sacrificed for a document to be comprehensive does not stand up." 88 88 89 89 90 -=== {{id name="#m2"/}} 4. Explain medical terms. === 91 91 92 - Medicalterms are unlikely to be understoodby your readers. It's similar to assuming they wouldknow a wordin a foreignlanguage.Follow the word or phrase with a plain English explanation.55 +== {{id name="m"/}}Medicine == 93 93 57 +People need letters and reports about their health from doctors and consultants to be easy to understand. And they need online information to be comprehensible. 94 94 95 -=== {{id name="#mo1"/}}5. Use clear language for financial information. === 96 96 97 -Dealing with financial issues can be stressful, which means your audience will have less cognitive capability available. Write information so that it is easy for them to understand. 98 - 60 +=== 1. Write clearly. === 99 99 100 - ==={{idname="#mo2"/}}6.Explaininancialterminology.===62 +Users of the information might be in shock or anxious, which reduces cognition. 101 101 102 -Avoid using financial jargon. Acronyms and pseudonyms may make sense internally, but people using your services may not understand them. 103 103 65 +=== 2. Explain medical terms. === 104 104 105 - ==={{idname="#mo3"/}}7.Giveexamplesofconceptualfinancialarrangements.===67 +Medical terms are likely not to be understood by your readers. It is likely assuming they would know a word in a foreign language. Follow the word or phrase with a plain English explanation. 106 106 107 -A tracker or shared ownership mortgage is easier to understand if you give examples. 108 108 109 - Thisismportantfor credit arrangements wherethereisaninitialnterest rate thatmaychange.70 +== Usability evidence for plain English in medicine == 110 110 111 - 112 ----- 113 - 114 -== {{id name="#UEL"/}}Usability evidence == 115 - 116 - 117 -[['Writing content for everyone'>>path:/xwiki/bin/get/Plain%20English/Plain%20English%2C%20simple%20sentences/?sheet=CKEditor.ResourceDispatcher&outputSyntax=plain&language=en&type=doc&reference=https%3A%2F%2Fgds.blog.gov.uk%2F2016%2F02%2F23%2Fwriting-content-for-everyone%2F]], R. Strachan, UK Government Digital Service blog, 2016 118 - 119 -=== Health specific === 120 - 121 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" id="H" %) 122 -[['Department of Health Stakeholder Report: 2012'>>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-of-health-stakeholder-report-2012]], research by Ipsos MORI, 2012 123 - 124 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 125 -[['Connecting with audiences. An evidence-based language sourcebook'>>http://www.linguisticlandscapes.co.uk/pdf/DH%20Language%20Guidelines%20230710%20FINAL_for%20website_240114.pdf]], Department of Health and Linguistic Landscapes, 2010, 2014 126 - 127 127 [[Guide to medical information>>http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/medicalguide.pdf]] from Plain English Campaign. 128 128 129 129 [[Guidance on writing letters to outpatients>>http://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Please_write_to_me_Guidance_010918.pdf]] from Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. 130 130 131 -[['Clarity is king – the evidence that reveals the desperate need to re-think the way we write'>>https://gds.blog.gov.uk/2014/02/17/guest-post-clarity-is-king-the-evidence-that-reveals-the-desperate-need-to-re-think-the-way-we-write/]] GDS blog, Mark Morris, 2014 132 132 133 - [[NHScontent style guidebeta>>https://beta.nhs.uk/service-manual/content/how-we-write]], January201977 +== {{id name="mo"/}}Money == 134 134 79 +Many people do not understand their finances and it causes them problems. Complex terminology describing concept-heavy arrangements about a non-tangible resource makes things difficult for everybody. 135 135 136 -=== Legal specific === 137 137 138 - [['JosephKimble—No,the law does not (normally)requirelegalese'>>url:http://www.ivacheung.com/2015/07/joseph-kimble-no-the-law-does-not-normally-require-legalese-editing-goes-global-2015/]] Editing Goes Global, 2015.Professor Joseph Kimble discusses the "psuedo-precision of legalese".82 +=== 1. Use clear language. === 139 139 140 -[[Plain language: the underlying research>>url:https://www.victorialawfoundation.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/Schriver_Karen%20Clarity2012.pdf]], Karen Schriver slide presentation, pages 29 to 35. 84 +Dealing with financial issues can be stressful, which means your audience will have less cognitive capability available. Make your information easy for them to understand. 85 +\\ 141 141 142 - [['Thepublicspeaks: an empiricalstudy of legal communication'>>https://works.bepress.com/christopher_trudeau/4/]], Christopher Trudeau, study includes solicitor casestudies, 201787 +=== 2. Explain terminology. === 143 143 144 - [['Legislative language andjudicial politics: The effects of changingparliamentarylanguageonUK immigration disputes'>>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1369148117705272]], Williams,M.,2017. Locked.RelatedeBook, preview chapter1: [['How languageworksinpolitics: Theimpact of vague legislationon policy'>>https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7FtoDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT412&lpg=PT412&dq=%27Legislative+language+and+judicial+politics:+The+effects+of+changing+parliamentary+language+on+UK+immigration+disputes%27&source=bl&ots=l1BDOgSCaL&sig=ACfU3U24809ZF9GVO2UJUExzz6B6h32Iqw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjkjtWA79XiAhUSTxUIHV3aBPYQ6AEwB3oECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false]], Williams, M.,201889 +Avoid using financial jargon. Acronyms and pseudonyms may make sense internally, but people using your services may not understand them. 145 145 146 - [['HowParliament’s failure to clearly articulate immigration policy forces judges to take control'>>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/parliamentary-language-and-immigration/]], Matthew Williams 'Legislative language and judicial politics' 2017 summarised in London School of Economics blog post91 + 147 147 148 - [['Ifoughtthe law and the users won: deliveringonlinevoter registration'>>https://gds.blog.gov.uk/2014/06/20/i-fought-the-law-and-the-users-won-delivering-online-voter-registration/]], Peter Herlihy,UK GovernmentDigital Service blog, 201493 +=== 3. Give examples of conceptual arrangements. === 149 149 150 - [[Richmond vs HRA>>url:http://www.alltrials.net/news/judgment-in-richmond-v-hra-judicial-review/]] Richmondpharmaceuticalcompany took theHealth Regulatory Authority to court because the websitewas confusing. A high courtjudgedecided thesitewas 'unlawful' and ruledagainst the government. The sitewas clearedthrougha legaldepartment. Thissetprecedentinthe UK. Youcan still be sued evenwith all thelegal language there, if the information is not clear.95 +A tracker or shared ownership mortgage is easier to understand if you give examples. 151 151 152 -[[Plain English Campaign>>url:http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/campaigning/past-campaigns/legal/drafting-in-plain-english.html]] believes legalese is unnecessary and does not do what it was intended to. "The argument that clarity should be sacrificed for a document to be comprehensive does not stand up." 153 - 97 +This is important for credit arrangements where there is an initial interest rate that may change. 154 154 155 -=== Finance specific === 156 156 100 +== Usability evidence for plain English in finance == 101 + 157 157 [[A to Z of financial terms (PDF 87KB)>>http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/files/financialguide.pdf]] from Plain English Campaign. 158 158 159 159 [[Plain English guide to financial term (PDF 686KB)>>https://www.nala.ie/resources/plain-english-guide-financial-terms]] from National Adult Literacy Agency, Ireland, January 2009. 160 - 161 - 162 -(% class="box" %) 163 -((( 164 -See also: 165 - 166 -* [[Plain English>>doc:Plain English.Plain English, simple sentences.WebHome]] 167 -* [[Simple sentences>>doc:Plain English.Simple sentences.WebHome]] 168 -* [[Specialist terms>>doc:Plain English.Specialist terms.WebHome]] 169 -* [[Words to avoid>>doc:Plain English.Words to avoid.WebHome]] 170 -)))