Changes for page Simple sentences
Last modified by Lizzie Bruce on 2020/01/11 23:51
From version 
2.20 
2.20
edited by Lizzie Bruce
on 2019/03/07 13:30
on 2019/03/07 13:30
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 2.6
2.6
edited by Lizzie Bruce
on 2019/03/07 11:13
on 2019/03/07 11:13
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
Details
-
Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,33 +1,6 @@ 1 1 (% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 2 - Thishelps:2 +Plain English 3 3 4 -* **people in a hurry** – simply written content is easier to scan and absorb instantly 5 -* **cognitive impairments** – easy to understand words and sentences need less cognition 6 -* **visual impairments** – short and simple sentences convey meaning in a smaller visual field 7 -* **motor impairments** – it's less tiring when you can understand what you read quickly 8 - 9 - 10 -== Guidelines == 11 - 12 -[[Plain English>>Plain English||anchor="pe"]] 13 - 14 -[[Simple sentences>>||anchor="ssl"]] 15 - 16 -[[Specialist terms>>||anchor="st"]] 17 - 18 -[[Medicine, money and law>>doc:.Medical.WebHome]] 19 - 20 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 21 -[[Words to avoid>>doc:.Words to avoid.WebHome]] 22 - 23 - 24 ----- 25 - 26 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 27 -== == 28 - 29 -== {{id name="pe"/}}Plain English == 30 - 31 31 Make content clear and understandable, to open the web up for users with different literacy levels and access challenges. 32 32 33 33 WCAG states that "using the clearest and simplest language appropriate is highly desirable." ... ... @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ 62 62 What is 'plain' for one person may not be for someone else. 63 63 64 64 65 -== Usability evidence for plain English==38 +== Usability evidence == 66 66 67 67 [[Guideline 3.1 Readable: Make text content readable and understandable.>>url:https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning-supplements.html]], Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, 2008. 68 68 ... ... @@ -80,150 +80,33 @@ 80 80 81 81 [[Plain language entry>>url:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_language]], Wikipedia, last updated 2018 82 82 56 +== Usability evidence == 83 83 84 --- --58 +[[Guideline 3.1 Readable: Make text content readable and understandable.>>url:https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning-supplements.html]], Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, 2008. 85 85 86 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 87 -== == 60 +[['Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities'>>url:http://templatelab.com/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/]], page 4 Article 2, Definitions, The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2018. 88 88 89 - == {{idname="ssl"/}}Simpleentences==62 +[['Plain Language Is for Everyone, Even Experts'>>url:https://www.nngroup.com/articles/plain-language-experts/]], H. Loranger, Nielsen Norman Group, 2017 90 90 64 +[['The Public Speaks: An Empirical Study of Legal Communication'>>url:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1843415]], C. R. Trudeau in 14 Scribes J. Leg. Writing 121 2012 91 91 92 - ===1.Makeyouraveragesentence 15 wordslong.===66 +[['Strengthening plain language'>>url:http://www.iplfederation.org/]], International Plain Language Federation. Undated. 93 93 94 - The maximumsentencelengthewould recommendforeasycomprehensionis25 words.68 +[[Plain Language Commission style guide>>url:https://www.clearest.co.uk/plain-language-commission-style-guide]], Plain Language Commission, 2011 95 95 96 - Youcan split longer sentencesup into2 or3 or restructure the contentth bulletpoints toke meaningclearerforusers.70 +[['The principles of readability'>>url:http://www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf]], Impact Information, William H. DuBay, 2004 97 97 72 +[[Plain language entry>>url:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_language]], Wikipedia, last updated 2018 98 98 99 -== =2. Avoidcomplexsentencestructures.===74 +== Short sentence length == 100 100 101 -They are less easy to comprehend quickly. Understanding them requires more cognitive effort than simple sentences. 102 - 103 103 104 -Complexity depends on: 105 105 106 -* number of clauses in a sentence, the more clauses the more complex it is 107 -* distribution of associated words across the sentence – how easily can the brain 'parse a phrase': recognise, connect and comprehend words that together convey meaning 108 - 78 +== Simple sentence structure == 109 109 110 ->Example:"The red fox jumped over the gate." – easier to understand 111 ->"The fox, which was red, over the gate jumped." – harder to understand 112 112 113 113 114 - == Usability evidence forsimplesentences ==82 +{{children/}} 115 115 116 -"People with some learning disabilities read letter for letter – they do not bounce around like other users. They also cannot fully understand a sentence if it’s too long. People with moderate learning disabilities can understand sentences of 5 to 8 words without difficulty. By using common words we can help all users understand sentences of around 25 words." GOV.UK 117 117 118 -The Oxford Guide to Plain English recommends 15–20 words per sentence. It also says: "…if you regularly exceed 40 words, you’ll certainly weary and deter your readers." 119 - 120 -Jyoti Sanyal, author of 'Indlish' said: "Based on several studies, press associations in the USA have laid down a readability table. Their survey shows readers find sentences of 8 words or less very easy to read; 11 words, easy; 14 words fairly easy; 17 words standard; 21 words fairly difficult; 25 words difficult and 29 words or more, very difficult." 121 - 122 -Author Ann Wylie said: "When the average sentence length in a piece was fewer than 8 words long, readers understood 100% of the story. At 14 words, they could comprehend more than 90% of the information. But move up to 43-word sentences and comprehension dropped below 10 percent." 123 - 124 -[[Writing for GOV.UK>>url:https://www.gov.uk/guidance/content-design/writing-for-gov-uk]], UK Government website 125 - 126 -[['Sentence length: why 25 words is our limit'>>url:https://insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk/2014/08/04/sentence-length-why-25-words-is-our-limit/]], Inside GOV.UK, UK Government blog, 2014 127 - 128 -[['Content design'>>url:https://contentdesign.london/book/]], Sarah Richards, 2017 129 - 130 -[['The role of word difficulty and sentence length in text comprehension'>>url:https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a114935.pdf]], T. M. Duffy and P. K. U'Ren, 1982 131 - 132 -[['The Influence of Semantics and Syntax on What Readers Remember'>>url:https://www.hcde.washington.edu/files/people/docs/Isakson_Spyridakis_Sem_Syn.pdf]], C. S. Isakson and J. H. Spyridakis, 1999 133 - 134 -[['How the brain attunes to sentence processing: Relating behavior, structure, and function'>>url:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819595/]], A. Fengler, L. Meyer, A. D. Friederici, National Center for Biotechnology Information 135 - 136 -[['Functional Analysis of Clause Complex in the Language of News Websites Texts: A Comparative Study of Two Articles'>>url:http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0616/ijsrp-p5445.pdf]], F. M. S. Eid, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016 137 - 138 -[[Reading Level>>url:https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning-supplements.html]], Understanding SC 3.1.5, WCAG, 2008 139 - 140 -[['Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Consumer Health Information'>>url:http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/53/10/1310/tab-pdf]], T. M. Walsh and T. A. Volsko in Respiratory Care October 2008, 53 (10) 1310-1315 141 - 142 -[['The research basis of plain language techniques: Implications for establishing standards'>>url:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Karen_Schriver/publication/285927928_The_research_basis_of_plain_language_techniques_Implications_for_establishing_standards/links/5664c50208ae192bbf90aa85/The-research-basis-of-plain-language-techniques-Implications-for-establishing-standards.pdf]], Karen Schriver, PhD, Dr. A. L. Cheek, M. Mercer, Center for Plain Language, November 20, 2008, Mexico City 143 - 144 -[['Readability Levels of Health-Based Websites: From Content to Comprehension'>>url:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ851863.pdf]], M. Schutten, A. McFarland, PhD, International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 2009, 12:99-107 145 - 146 -[['Writing smaller'>>url:http://clarity-international.net/journals/63.pdf]], Clarity Journal no. 63, 2010 147 - 148 -[[Plain Language Commission style guide>>url:https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/aaf9e928/files/uploaded/PLCstyleguide25July2012.pdf]], 2012 149 - 150 -[['Shorter Lines Facilitate Reading in Those Who Struggle'>>url:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0071161]], Matthew H. Schneps , Jenny M. Thomson, Gerhard Sonnert, Marc Pomplun, Chen Chen, Amanda Heffner-Wong, 2013 151 - 152 -[['Towards a better measure of readability: Explanation of empirical performance results'>>url:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00437956.1989.11435805]], Leslie A. Olsen & Rod Johnson, Taylor & Francis Group, 2015 153 - 154 -[['What is plain language?'>>url:https://plainlanguagenetwork.org/plain-language/what-is-plain-language/]], Plain Language Association International, 2015 155 - 156 -[[Text complexity, ATOS, and Lexile® Measures>>url:https://www.renaissance.com/products/practice/accelerated-reader-360/atos-and-text-complexity/]], Renaissance Learning, 2016 157 - 158 -[['Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports.'>>url:https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40900-017-0064-0]] 2017 159 - 160 -[['How to use Yoast SEO: The readability analysis?'>>url:https://yoast.com/yoast-seo-readability-analysis/]] Edwin Toonen, Yoast, 2018 161 - 162 -[[The Crystal Mark standard>>url:http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/services/crystal-mark/7-the-crystal-mark-standard.html]] Plain English Campaign, undated 163 - 164 - 165 ----- 166 - 167 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 168 -== == 169 - 170 -== {{id name="st"/}}Specialist terms == 171 - 172 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 173 -Make specialist content comprehensible by non-experts. 174 - 175 - 176 -=== 1. Explain specialist terms: anybody can access your content. === 177 - 178 -Assuming who your audience is, and that they'll understand the technical terms you use, are common misconceptions. 179 - 180 - 181 -=== 2. Create content that all users can understand, whatever their expertise or background. === 182 - 183 -When you present a concept explain its parts and processes in detail. 184 - 185 -If you need to include a technical term consider explaining it. Make sure the surrounding language in plain language. 186 - 187 - 188 -=== 3. Help users understand specialist terms. === 189 - 190 -You could: 191 - 192 -* link to an existing definition – this could be an external site 193 -* add a explanatory definition after using the term 194 194 195 - 196 ->Example: 197 -> 198 ->"It is a Palladian style stone building, and contains a number of splendid paintings and much fine wood-carving." – original sentence. 199 -> 200 ->"It is a [[Palladian style>>url:http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/s/style-guide-palladianism/]] stone building, and contains a number of splendid paintings and much fine wood-carving." – with link to a definition. 201 -> "It is a Palladian style stone building and contains a number of splendid paintings and much fine wood-carving. Palladian style architecture features include columns, symmetry and decorative arches." – with explanatory definition. 202 - 203 - 204 -== Usability evidence for explaining specialist terms == 205 - 206 -[['Writing Digital Copy for Domain Experts'>>url:https://www.nngroup.com/articles/writing-domain-experts/]], Nielson Norman Group, 2017 207 - 208 -[['Writing Digital Copy for Specialists vs. General Audiences'>>url:https://www.nngroup.com/videos/writing-digital-copy-specialists/?lm=how-users-read-on-the-web&pt=article]], Nielson Norman Group, undated 209 - 210 -[['Plain Language For Everyone, Even Experts'>>url:https://www.nngroup.com/videos/plain-language-for-experts/?lm=how-users-read-on-the-web&pt=article]] Nielson Norman Group, undated 211 - 212 -[['TechWhirl Fast 5: Understanding Plain Language and Simplified Technical English'>>url:https://techwhirl.com/techwhirl-fast-5-understanding-plain-language-simplified-technical-english/]], Connie Giordano, TechWhirl, 2017 213 - 214 -[['Advantages and disadvantages with Simplified Technical English'>>url:https://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:16816/FULLTEXT01]], Msc thesis paper, Karin Disborg, 2007 215 - 216 -[['Technical Writing Need Not Be Abstruse—Use Plain Language for Maximum Impact'>>url:https://digital.gov/2015/10/23/technical-writing-need-not-be-abstruse-use-plain-language-for-maximum-impact/#]], Colleen Blessing, 2015 217 - 218 -[['The Facets of the General Public as Audience'>>url:https://www.dropbox.com/s/2u2cybl7c57u0tr/AudienceIssues.pdf?dl=0]] Cheryl Stephens and Mariah Stufflebeam, 2017 219 - 220 - 221 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 222 -We generated the [[original sentence about a specialist architecture term>>url:http://sentence.yourdictionary.com/palladian]] from yourdictionary.com. 223 - 224 - 225 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 226 -Here's some sector specific guidance for [[medicine, money and law>>doc:.Medical.WebHome]]. 227 - 228 - 229 -And here's our list of jargon [[words to avoid>>doc:.Words to avoid.WebHome]]!