Changes for page Simple sentences
Last modified by Lizzie Bruce on 2020/01/11 23:51
From version 2.6
edited by Lizzie Bruce
on 2019/03/07 11:13
on 2019/03/07 11:13
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 2.16
edited by Lizzie Bruce
on 2019/03/07 13:11
on 2019/03/07 13:11
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,27 @@ 1 1 (% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 2 - PlainEnglish2 +This helps: 3 3 4 +* **people in a hurry** – simply written content is easier to scan and absorb instantly 5 +* **cognitive impairments** – easy to understand words and sentences need less cognition 6 +* **visual impairments** – short and simple sentences convey meaning in a smaller visual field 7 +* **motor impairments** – it's less tiring when you can understand what you read quickly 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 +== Guidelines == 12 + 13 +[[Plain English>>Plain English||anchor="pe"]] 14 + 15 +[[Simple sentences >> ||anchor="ssl"]] 16 + 17 +[[Specialist terms>>Specialist terms||anchor="st"]] 18 + 19 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 20 +Words to avoid 21 + 22 + 23 +== {{id name="pe"/}}Plain English == 24 + 4 4 Make content clear and understandable, to open the web up for users with different literacy levels and access challenges. 5 5 6 6 WCAG states that "using the clearest and simplest language appropriate is highly desirable." ... ... @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ 35 35 What is 'plain' for one person may not be for someone else. 36 36 37 37 38 -== Usability evidence == 59 +== Usability evidence for plain English == 39 39 40 40 [[Guideline 3.1 Readable: Make text content readable and understandable.>>url:https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning-supplements.html]], Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, 2008. 41 41 ... ... @@ -53,32 +53,150 @@ 53 53 54 54 [[Plain language entry>>url:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_language]], Wikipedia, last updated 2018 55 55 56 -== Usability evidence == 57 57 58 - [[Guideline3.1 Readable: Make text content readableand understandable.>>url:https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning-supplements.html]],Web Content AccessibilityGuidelines (WCAG) 2.0, 2008.78 +== {{id name="ssl"/}}Simple sentences == 59 59 60 -[['Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities'>>url:http://templatelab.com/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/]], page 4 Article 2, Definitions, The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2018. 61 61 62 - [['PlainLanguageIs forEveryone,EvenExperts'>>url:https://www.nngroup.com/articles/plain-language-experts/]],H. Loranger, NielsenNormanGroup, 201781 +=== 1. Make your average sentence 15 words long. === 63 63 64 - [['ThePublicSpeaks: AnEmpiricalStudyof LegalCommunication'>>url:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1843415]],C. R. Trudeauin 14 Scribes J. Leg. Writing121201283 +The maximum sentence length we would recommend for easy comprehension is 25 words. 65 65 66 - [['Strengtheningplainlanguage'>>url:http://www.iplfederation.org/]],InternationalPlainLanguageFederation.Undated.85 +You can split longer sentences up into 2 or 3 or restructure the content with bullet points to make meaning clearer for users. 67 67 68 -[[Plain Language Commission style guide>>url:https://www.clearest.co.uk/plain-language-commission-style-guide]], Plain Language Commission, 2011 69 69 70 - [['Theprinciplesof readability'>>url:http://www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf]],ImpactInformation, William H.DuBay, 200488 +== 2. Avoid complex sentence structures. == 71 71 72 -[[Plain language entry>>url:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_language]], Wikipedia, last updated 2018 90 +They are less easy to comprehend quickly. Understanding them requires more cognitive effort than simple sentences. 91 + 73 73 74 - == Shortsentencelength ==93 +Complexity depends on: 75 75 95 +* number of clauses in a sentence, the more clauses the more complex it is 96 +* distribution of associated words across the sentence – how easily can the brain 'parse a phrase': recognise, connect and comprehend words that together convey meaning 97 + 76 76 99 +>Example:"The red fox jumped over the gate." – easier to understand 100 +>"The fox, which was red, over the gate jumped." – harder to understand 77 77 78 -== Simple sentence structure == 79 79 103 +== Usability evidence for simple sentences == 80 80 105 +"People with some learning disabilities read letter for letter – they do not bounce around like other users. They also cannot fully understand a sentence if it’s too long. People with moderate learning disabilities can understand sentences of 5 to 8 words without difficulty. By using common words we can help all users understand sentences of around 25 words." GOV.UK 81 81 107 +The Oxford Guide to Plain English recommends 15–20 words per sentence. It also says: "…if you regularly exceed 40 words, you’ll certainly weary and deter your readers." 108 + 109 +Jyoti Sanyal, author of 'Indlish' said: "Based on several studies, press associations in the USA have laid down a readability table. Their survey shows readers find sentences of 8 words or less very easy to read; 11 words, easy; 14 words fairly easy; 17 words standard; 21 words fairly difficult; 25 words difficult and 29 words or more, very difficult." 110 + 111 +Author Ann Wylie said: "When the average sentence length in a piece was fewer than 8 words long, readers understood 100% of the story. At 14 words, they could comprehend more than 90% of the information. But move up to 43-word sentences and comprehension dropped below 10 percent." 112 + 113 +[[Writing for GOV.UK>>url:https://www.gov.uk/guidance/content-design/writing-for-gov-uk]], UK Government website 114 + 115 +[['Sentence length: why 25 words is our limit'>>url:https://insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk/2014/08/04/sentence-length-why-25-words-is-our-limit/]], Inside GOV.UK, UK Government blog, 2014 116 + 117 +[['Content design'>>url:https://contentdesign.london/book/]], Sarah Richards, 2017 118 + 119 +[['The role of word difficulty and sentence length in text comprehension'>>url:https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a114935.pdf]], T. M. Duffy and P. K. U'Ren, 1982 120 + 121 +[['The Influence of Semantics and Syntax on What Readers Remember'>>url:https://www.hcde.washington.edu/files/people/docs/Isakson_Spyridakis_Sem_Syn.pdf]], C. S. Isakson and J. H. Spyridakis, 1999 122 + 123 +[['How the brain attunes to sentence processing: Relating behavior, structure, and function'>>url:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4819595/]], A. Fengler, L. Meyer, A. D. Friederici, National Center for Biotechnology Information 124 + 125 +[['Functional Analysis of Clause Complex in the Language of News Websites Texts: A Comparative Study of Two Articles'>>url:http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0616/ijsrp-p5445.pdf]], F. M. S. Eid, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016 126 + 127 +[[Reading Level>>url:https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning-supplements.html]], Understanding SC 3.1.5, WCAG, 2008 128 + 129 +[['Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Consumer Health Information'>>url:http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/53/10/1310/tab-pdf]], T. M. Walsh and T. A. Volsko in Respiratory Care October 2008, 53 (10) 1310-1315 130 + 131 +[['The research basis of plain language techniques: Implications for establishing standards'>>url:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Karen_Schriver/publication/285927928_The_research_basis_of_plain_language_techniques_Implications_for_establishing_standards/links/5664c50208ae192bbf90aa85/The-research-basis-of-plain-language-techniques-Implications-for-establishing-standards.pdf]], Karen Schriver, PhD, Dr. A. L. Cheek, M. Mercer, Center for Plain Language, November 20, 2008, Mexico City 132 + 133 +[['Readability Levels of Health-Based Websites: From Content to Comprehension'>>url:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ851863.pdf]], M. Schutten, A. McFarland, PhD, International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 2009, 12:99-107 134 + 135 +[['Writing smaller'>>url:http://clarity-international.net/journals/63.pdf]], Clarity Journal no. 63, 2010 136 + 137 +[[Plain Language Commission style guide>>url:https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/aaf9e928/files/uploaded/PLCstyleguide25July2012.pdf]], 2012 138 + 139 +[['Shorter Lines Facilitate Reading in Those Who Struggle'>>url:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0071161]], Matthew H. Schneps , Jenny M. Thomson, Gerhard Sonnert, Marc Pomplun, Chen Chen, Amanda Heffner-Wong, 2013 140 + 141 +[['Towards a better measure of readability: Explanation of empirical performance results'>>url:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00437956.1989.11435805]], Leslie A. Olsen & Rod Johnson, Taylor & Francis Group, 2015 142 + 143 +[['What is plain language?'>>url:https://plainlanguagenetwork.org/plain-language/what-is-plain-language/]], Plain Language Association International, 2015 144 + 145 +[[Text complexity, ATOS, and Lexile® Measures>>url:https://www.renaissance.com/products/practice/accelerated-reader-360/atos-and-text-complexity/]], Renaissance Learning, 2016 146 + 147 +[['Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports.'>>url:https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40900-017-0064-0]] 2017 148 + 149 +[['How to use Yoast SEO: The readability analysis?'>>url:https://yoast.com/yoast-seo-readability-analysis/]] Edwin Toonen, Yoast, 2018 150 + 151 +[[The Crystal Mark standard>>url:http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/services/crystal-mark/7-the-crystal-mark-standard.html]] Plain English Campaign, undated 152 + 153 + 154 +== {{id name="st"/}}Specialist terms: explain them == 155 + 156 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 157 +Make specialist content comprehensible by non-experts. 158 + 159 + 160 +=== 1. Remember that anybody can access your content. === 161 + 162 +Assuming who your audience is, and that they'll understand the technical terms you use, are common misconceptions. 163 + 164 + 165 +=== 2. Create content that all users can understand, whatever their expertise or background. === 166 + 167 +When you present a concept explain its parts and processes in detail. 168 + 169 +If you need to include a technical term consider explaining it. Make sure the surrounding language in plain language. 170 + 171 + 172 +=== 3. Help users understand specialist terms. === 173 + 174 +You could: 175 + 176 +* link to an existing definition – this could be an external site 177 +* add a explanatory definition after using the term 178 + 179 + 180 +>Example: 181 +> 182 +>"It is a Palladian style stone building, and contains a number of splendid paintings and much fine wood-carving." – original sentence. 183 +> 184 +>"It is a [[Palladian style>>url:http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/s/style-guide-palladianism/]] stone building, and contains a number of splendid paintings and much fine wood-carving." – with link to a definition. 185 +> "It is a Palladian style stone building and contains a number of splendid paintings and much fine wood-carving. Palladian style architecture features include columns, symmetry and decorative arches." – with explanatory definition. 186 + 187 + 188 +== Usability evidence for explaining specialist terms == 189 + 190 +[['Writing Digital Copy for Domain Experts'>>url:https://www.nngroup.com/articles/writing-domain-experts/]], Nielson Norman Group, 2017 191 + 192 +[['Writing Digital Copy for Specialists vs. General Audiences'>>url:https://www.nngroup.com/videos/writing-digital-copy-specialists/?lm=how-users-read-on-the-web&pt=article]], Nielson Norman Group, undated 193 + 194 +[['Plain Language For Everyone, Even Experts'>>url:https://www.nngroup.com/videos/plain-language-for-experts/?lm=how-users-read-on-the-web&pt=article]] Nielson Norman Group, undated 195 + 196 +[['TechWhirl Fast 5: Understanding Plain Language and Simplified Technical English'>>url:https://techwhirl.com/techwhirl-fast-5-understanding-plain-language-simplified-technical-english/]], Connie Giordano, TechWhirl, 2017 197 + 198 +[['Advantages and disadvantages with Simplified Technical English'>>url:https://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:16816/FULLTEXT01]], Msc thesis paper, Karin Disborg, 2007 199 + 200 +[['Technical Writing Need Not Be Abstruse—Use Plain Language for Maximum Impact'>>url:https://digital.gov/2015/10/23/technical-writing-need-not-be-abstruse-use-plain-language-for-maximum-impact/#]], Colleen Blessing, 2015 201 + 202 +[['The Facets of the General Public as Audience'>>url:https://www.dropbox.com/s/2u2cybl7c57u0tr/AudienceIssues.pdf?dl=0]] Cheryl Stephens and Mariah Stufflebeam, 2017 203 + 204 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 205 +We generated the [[before sentence about an architecture term>>url:http://sentence.yourdictionary.com/palladian]] from yourdictionary.com and applied our recommendations. 206 + 207 + 208 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 209 +Here's some sector specific guidance: 210 + 211 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 212 +Legal 213 + 214 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 215 +Medical 216 + 217 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" %) 218 +Financial 219 + 220 + 82 82 {{children/}} 83 83 84 84