Wiki source code of Readability Guidelines
Version 14.5 by Lizzie Bruce on 2019/12/05 09:28
Hide last authors
author | version | line-number | content |
---|---|---|---|
6.66 | 1 | (% class="box" %) | |
8.4 | 2 | A project from [[Content Design London>>http://contentdesign.London]]. | |
14.2 | 3 | \\"Imagine a collaboratively developed, universal content style guide, based on usability evidence. With guidelines for creating easy to comprehend content, we can design inclusively by default." – Sarah Richards | |
6.82 | 4 | ||
5 | (% class="box" %) | ||
6.66 | 6 | ((( | |
6.92 | 7 | **[[Clear language>>doc:Plain English.WebHome]]** | |
6.66 | 8 | ))) | |
9 | |||
6.88 | 10 | (% class="box" %) | |
6.91 | 11 | **[[Grammar points>>doc:Punctuation and abbreviating.WebHome]]** | |
6.88 | 12 | ||
13 | (% class="box" %) | ||
14.1 | 14 | **[[Audiences, devices, channels>>doc:People.WebHome]]** | |
6.88 | 15 | ||
16 | (% class="box" %) | ||
6.91 | 17 | **[[Content design>>doc:User centred design.WebHome]]** | |
6.88 | 18 | ||
6.21 | 19 | == | |
6.86 | 20 | {{id name="#W"/}}The project == | |
6.1 | 21 | ||
10.1 | 22 | In 2018 Sarah Richards asked if, working together, we can create a [[universal, inclusive style guide>>url:https://contentdesign.london/blog/usability/readability-guidelines]]. Because "style guide" can mean different things, we called it the Readability Guidelines project. | |
6.20 | 23 | ||
10.5 | 24 | Content professionals in multiple sectors held regular global discussions for a total of 24 weeks. This was [[Alpha>>||anchor="Alpha"]] and [[Beta>>||anchor="Beta"]]. And it's all continuing: you can [[get involved>>||anchor="Gi"]]. | |
6.65 | 25 | ||
6.61 | 26 | ||
6.87 | 27 | (% class="box" %) | |
28 | ((( | ||
14.3 | 29 | [[Checklist>>doc:.Readability checklist.WebHome]] | |
6.87 | 30 | ))) | |
31 | |||
32 | (% class="box" %) | ||
33 | ((( | ||
14.3 | 34 | [[Top findings>>doc:.Top findings.WebHome||style="background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245);"]] | |
35 | ))) | ||
36 | |||
37 | (% class="box" %) | ||
38 | ((( | ||
6.87 | 39 | [[Our usability questions>>doc:.Usability questions.WebHome]] | |
40 | ))) | ||
41 | |||
42 | (% class="box" %) | ||
43 | ((( | ||
44 | [[Testing we want to do>>doc:.New research.WebHome]] | ||
45 | ))) | ||
46 | |||
6.34 | 47 | === (% style="color:inherit; font-family:inherit; font-size:26px" %){{id name="Alpha"/}}(%%)Alpha === | |
6.1 | 48 | ||
7.2 | 49 | We asked if: | |
1.1 | 50 | ||
1.12 | 51 | ((( | |
7.2 | 52 | * an open community of content people want to contribute to a single style guide | |
53 | * we'd like to rely on evidence for the style guide elements – and if yes, what evidence would be most useful | ||
54 | * a wiki model is sustainable | ||
1.2 | 55 | ))) | |
1.1 | 56 | ||
1.26 | 57 | Read the [[final Alpha blog update>>https://contentdesign.london/research/readability-alpha-the-end/]]. | |
1.1 | 58 | ||
1.2 | 59 | Alpha ran from July to October, 2018. | |
1.5 | 60 | ||
1.1 | 61 | ||
6.22 | 62 | === {{id name="Beta"/}}Beta === | |
1.1 | 63 | ||
6.55 | 64 | From the Alpha discussions we identified 17 content style [[usability questions>>doc:.Usability questions.WebHome]]. We searched for evidence to answer them in Beta. | |
1.1 | 65 | ||
6.98 | 66 | By the end we created the first readability guidelines, identified [[top level findings>>doc:Main.Top findings.WebHome]] and accepted that some style points needed further testing. | |
6.55 | 67 | ||
1.26 | 68 | Read the [[final Beta blog update>>url:https://contentdesign.london/content-process/readability-guidelines-beta-update-4-by-lizzie-bruce/]]. | |
1.1 | 69 | ||
70 | Beta was October to December 2018. | ||
1.5 | 71 | ||
1.1 | 72 | ||
6.93 | 73 | (% class="box" %) | |
74 | ((( | ||
6.1 | 75 | == {{id name="Gi"/}}Get involved == | |
1.8 | 76 | ||
1.25 | 77 | Explore and join us: | |
1.8 | 78 | ||
1.10 | 79 | ((( | |
6.19 | 80 | * read the global Slack discussions: [[readabilityguidelines.slack.com>>url:https://readabilityguidelines.slack.com/]], join: [[bit.ly/2D0OW1F>>url:https://bit.ly/2D0OW1F]] | |
9.1 | 81 | * read the Content Design London [[project blog posts>>https://contentdesign.london/usability/readability-guidelines/]] | |
1.11 | 82 | * watch the London Accessibility MeetUp [[Readability Guidelines talk>>url:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQzdtE8JQOs]]' | |
1.10 | 83 | * share usability studies and academic research evidence on this wiki | |
84 | * follow #ReadabilityGuidelines on Twitter and LinkedIn | ||
85 | |||
86 | We have almost 500 members in our Slack community. | ||
6.3 | 87 | ||
1.8 | 88 | ))) | |
89 | |||
6.23 | 90 | == Editing the wiki == | |
1.1 | 91 | ||
12.1 | 92 | This is a totally open project. You're welcome to comment on, edit or create wiki pages. | |
9.2 | 93 | The only rules are: | |
1.2 | 94 | ||
1.16 | 95 | * be respectful | |
96 | * make any comments in the spirit of positive open learning | ||
6.101 | 97 | * read the wiki pages carefully, and study existing evidence, before making comments and edits | |
98 | * include usability evidence to support any edits | ||
1.16 | 99 | ||
9.1 | 100 | === Getting a log in === | |
101 | |||
9.2 | 102 | You can comment on any page without logging in. | |
103 | But if you'd like to add usability evidence please [[request a log-in>>mailto:lizzie@contentdesign.london]]. It may take a few days for us to set up your wiki account. | ||
6.100 | 104 | ||
105 | Any comments or queries outside of this wiki, please get in touch on twitter [[@ContentDesignLN>>url:https://readabilityguidelines.slack.com]]. | ||
6.93 | 106 | ))) | |
6.32 | 107 | ||
6.94 | 108 | == | |
109 | Wiki sections == | ||
6.32 | 110 | ||
6.97 | 111 | * [[Clear language>>path:/xwiki/bin/view/Plain%20English/]] | |
112 | * [[Grammar points>>path:/xwiki/bin/view/Punctuation%20and%20abbreviating/]] | ||
113 | * [[Audiences>>path:/xwiki/bin/view/Audience%20descriptors/]] | ||
6.32 | 114 | * [[Content design>>path:/xwiki/bin/view/User%20centred%20design/]] |